Headroom / Market data

What 200 credit agreements say about covenants

Public-company credit agreements filed with the SEC, 2021 to 2025. By . Published October 28, 2026.

We read the financial covenants and the EBITDA definition in 200 credit agreements, 40 from each year from 2021 to 2025, and matched every coded term to a verbatim quote in the agreement. Four findings stand out: most agreements that define EBITDA cap at least some add-backs, the most common cap is 15% of EBITDA, 72% of agreements with a leverage covenant let it loosen after a big acquisition, usually for a year, and equity cures are almost absent.

65%of agreements that define EBITDA cap at least one add-back (94 of 145)
15%the most common add-back cap, as a share of EBITDA
72%of agreements with a leverage covenant allow an acquisition step-up (76 of 106)
2.5%of agreements have an equity cure (5 of 200)

Add-back caps: common, and usually 10 to 25%

145 of the 200 agreements define EBITDA. Most of the rest use debt-to-capitalization or similar balance-sheet tests instead. Of the 145, 94 (65%) cap at least one category of add-back, most often restructuring and integration costs, projected cost savings and non-recurring charges.

Headline add-back cap70 agreements with a percentage cap
Show as table
Headline add-back cap
Cap levelAgreements
10% or less21
12.5% to 15%21
20%14
25%11
30% or more3

Where the cap is a percentage, the most common level is 15%, and the median is 15%. How the cap is measured matters as much as the level: in 56 of the 70 percentage caps it is measured against EBITDA before the capped add-backs, and in 6 against EBITDA after them, which is looser (a 20% cap measured after add-backs allows up to 25% of pre-add-back EBITDA). 8 don't say. One example:

…the aggregate amounts added to Consolidated EBITDA pursuant to this clause (b) in any such period shall not exceed 15% of Consolidated EBITDA for such period (calculated before giving effect to the adjustment set forth in this clause (b))…

TechnipFMC plc, credit agreement filed with the SEC

Run-rate savings. 54 of the 145 agreements (37%) let the borrower add back cost savings or synergies it expects but hasn't realized yet. 36 of the 48 that state a window give 12 or 18 months to realize them, and 9 allow them with no cap at all.

Time allowed to realize run-rate savings48 agreements that state it
Show as table
Time allowed to realize run-rate savings
WindowAgreements
4 months1
6 months1
12 months18
18 months18
24 months10

Leverage limits cluster at 3.50x to 4.00x

106 of the 200 agreements (53%) have a maximum leverage covenant. The most common initial limit is 3.50x (34 of the 107 leverage covenants; one agreement has two) and the median is 3.75x. Some limits start higher to allow for an acquisition and step down later; using each covenant's final level, the median is 3.50x. These are public companies, many of them large, and the levels sit below the 4.25x median reported for leveraged loans.

Initial maximum leverage107 leverage covenants, at the first test date
Show as table
Initial maximum leverage
MaximumCovenants
Under 3.25x9
3.25x5
3.50x34
3.75x16
4.00x15
4.25x to 4.75x15
5.00x or more13

Interest coverage is even more standardized: 70 agreements have a minimum, 30 of them at exactly 3.00x (median 3.00x).

Minimum interest coverage70 interest coverage covenants
Show as table
Minimum interest coverage
MinimumCovenants
Under 2.50x7
2.50x to 2.75x10
3.00x30
3.25x to 3.50x15
3.75x or more8

Acquisition step-ups are the norm, not the exception

76 of the 106 agreements with a leverage covenant (72%) let the limit rise after a qualifying acquisition. This is an acquisition step-up, sometimes called a leverage holiday: the covenant is still tested, at a higher limit. The typical version adds 0.50x (51 of the 66 step-ups measured against the initial limit) for four quarters (65 of 75). In at least 18 of the 76 agreements the borrower has to elect it. Acquisitions have to clear a size threshold first; the median is about $263 million.

Size of the acquisition step-up66 step-ups, measured against the initial limit
Show as table
Size of the acquisition step-up
IncreaseStep-ups
+0.25x7
+0.50x51
+0.75x2
+1.00x6

…elect to increase the maximum Net Leverage Ratio permitted under this Section 6.10(a) to 4.00 to 1.00 for a period of four consecutive fiscal quarters commencing with the fiscal quarter in which such Specified Acquisition occurs…

Tennant Company, credit agreement filed with the SEC

9 step-ups raise a limit that has already stepped down, so they aren't in the size chart. We found no published count for public-company agreements; covenant research services track this for leveraged loans. For a borrower, the practical point is that a step-up that must be elected has to be elected on time, and it expires on schedule. Headroom builds step-ups into its covenant math.

What's rare in public-company agreements

How this compares with published studies

MeasureThis samplePublished figure
Equity cure present2.5%5.6% to 9.2% of deals in LexisNexis Market Standards surveys (LexisNexis, 2023)
Median maximum leverage3.75x4.25x in leveraged loans to public firms, 2017 to 2019 (Boston Fed, 2022)
Median minimum interest coverage3.00x3.0x in the same leveraged loans (Boston Fed, 2022)
Actual leverage at closing (not a covenant limit), private creditn/a5.1x average for U.S. private credit deals in 2025 (Proskauer, 2026)

The pattern is what you'd expect: public companies carry less debt than leveraged and private-credit borrowers, so their limits sit lower, with fewer step-downs and almost no equity cures. Sponsor-backed private loans look different, and testing on them is next.

Method and limits

Download the data (CSV, 200 agreements, each with its SEC link)

This report describes contract terms in public filings. It is not legal, credit or investment advice.